A simple definition of pathetic fallacy is that it’s a literary device where a writer attributes human emotions or characteristics to non-human things like weather, animals, or objects. The term combines the Latin pathos (meaning emotion) and the Greek word fallacy (meaning mistaken belief). This device brings the natural world to life by reflecting a character’s emotions or moods, helping readers connect emotionally with the story. Often used across various genres and time periods, pathetic fallacy sets the mood, foreshadows events, and highlights themes, making it a powerful storytelling tool that shapes how readers engage with a text. This article explores its origins, uses, and how writers can apply it effectively while avoiding common pitfalls.
What is Pathetic Fallacy? A Simple Definition
At its core, pathetic fallacy is the attribution of human emotions or human characteristics to inanimate objects or nature, such as the weather, landscapes, or animals. It is a specific form of personification, focusing on projecting human feelings and emotional states onto the natural world. For example, if a character is sad, and the weather reflects gloominess with rain or thunder, this is an instance of pathetic fallacy.
Consider the following example from Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights:
“The intense horror of nightmare came over me: I tried to move, but the hand clung to mine, and the thunder growled, and the lightning split the sky, as if nature herself was as enraged as I was.”
In this excerpt, the storm isn’t just described as happening in the background but is imbued with emotional intensity, mirroring the character’s inner turmoil. The thunder and lightning are presented as an extension of the character’s rage or fear, reinforcing the emotional atmosphere of the scene.
This use of pathetic fallacy enhances the reader’s emotional connection and resonance with the story, helping them feel the character’s emotional state. It also underlines themes such as the harmony or dissonance between human emotions and the larger forces of the natural world.
Historical Roots of Pathetic Fallacy
The concept of pathetic fallacy has its roots in Romanticism and earlier literary traditions. The term was coined by Victorian art critic John Ruskin in his work Modern Painters (1843). He used the term somewhat disparagingly to describe the attribution of human feelings to nature, which he considered a form of emotional falseness or flawed reasoning.
Despite its initially negative connotation, the technique has been embraced by writers and poets throughout history, especially during the Romantic period. Writers like William Wordsworth, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and John Keats often used pathetic fallacy to express the deep emotional and spiritual connections between humans and nature. Nature was portrayed not just as a backdrop but as an active participant in the emotional experiences of characters.
For example, in Wordsworth’s famous poem I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud, the daffodils are described as “dancing” and “fluttering,” which imbues the flowers with a lively infant-like joy that corresponds to the speaker’s inner happiness:
“Ten thousand saw I at a glance, Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.”
This vivid imagery goes beyond simple description, creating an emotional connection between the natural world and the speaker’s mood. The daffodils seem almost alive, mirroring the speaker’s feelings.
While Ruskin criticised the device, it is important to understand that pathetic fallacy is about enhancing emotional resonance in literature. Nature becomes a powerful mirror, amplifying human emotions and enriching the reader’s experience.
Pathetic Fallacy versus Personification: Literary Terms Explained
Pathetic fallacy and personification are related literary terms but differ in focus. Both involve bringing inanimate objects or non-human entities to life by giving them human qualities, but their scope varies.
Pathetic fallacy specifically attributes human emotions to aspects of nature or objects to reflect a character’s emotional state or to set the mood of a scene. For example, a friendly sun shining warmly on party guests or a gloomy sky darkening a tense scene are instances of pathetic fallacy.
Personification is broader, attributing any human quality, action, or intention to non-human things—not just emotions. Saying “the rocking chair waited silently” or “the wind whispered through the trees” are personifications that may not involve feelings but instead human behaviours.
In summary:
- Pathetic fallacy = giving human emotions to nature or objects to reflect feelings.
- Personification = giving any human quality or action to non-human things.
Understanding these distinctions helps readers and writers appreciate how figurative language works to create emotional impact and vivid imagery in creative writing, especially when analysing literature pathetic fallacy examples.
The Role of Pathetic Fallacy in Creative Writing: Using It Effectively
Pathetic fallacy is a versatile literary device that serves several key purposes:
Setting the Tone and Mood
Pathetic fallacy helps set the emotional atmosphere of a scene. For example, stormy weather and dark clouds can suggest foreboding or impending doom, while a friendly sun shining on party guests can evoke warmth and happiness.
In Shakespeare’s Macbeth, the stormy weather surrounding Duncan’s murder reflects the disruption of the natural order caused by Macbeth’s actions:
“The earth hath bubbles, as the water has, And these are of them. Whither are they vanish’d?”
The tumultuous weather mirrors the chaos and moral confusion within the play, reinforcing themes of guilt and disorder.
Foreshadowing Events
Pathetic fallacy can foreshadow future events by signalling mood shifts or impending conflict. For instance, dark clouds gathering or sudden changes in weather can hint at tragedy.
In The Great Gatsby, the oppressive heat before Gatsby’s death mirrors the characters’ emotional tension, with the weather serving as a harbinger:
“The air was thick with the heaviest, most oppressive heat, and the sun was beating down on the ground like a hammer.”
Symbolism and Theme
Nature often symbolises broader themes, and pathetic fallacy amplifies this by associating natural elements with human emotions.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the storm accompanying Victor’s creation of the monster mirrors themes of creation and destruction:
“It was on a dreary night of November that I beheld the accomplishment of my toils.”
The weather reinforces the gothic atmosphere and foreshadows tragic consequences.
Characterisation
Pathetic fallacy reflects a character’s psychological state by mirroring their emotions in the external world.
In Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s The Yellow Wallpaper, the oppressive environment mirrors the protagonist’s descent into madness:
“The pattern does move, and no wonder! The woman behind it shakes it!”
This creates a strong emotional connection between the character’s mental state and her surroundings, linking the external world to the character’s state.
Pathetic Fallacy in Various Genres: Literature and Beyond
Pathetic fallacy occurs across various genres, including poetry, classic and modern literature, and even music lyrics. Its ability to link emotions with the natural world makes it a widely used literary technique.
In poetry, pathetic fallacy creates vivid imagery that conveys emotional states. In novels like Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations, weather and setting reflect mood and social atmosphere, deepening themes.
Music lyrics often use pathetic fallacy by attributing emotions to natural elements, showing how this device transcends literary boundaries.
Common Pathetic Fallacy Examples
Here are some examples illustrating pathetic fallacy effectively:
- “The blue and gentle sky smiled down on the fair lakes reflect the peaceful scene.” This example uses nature’s elements to mirror a calm and joyful mood.
- “The giant ocean roared angrily, mirroring the character’s rage.” The ocean’s behaviour reflects human emotion.
- “The gentle sky darkened as the narrator describes the coming storm of conflict.” The sky’s change symbolises tension and foreshadowing.
These examples show how pathetic fallacy brings non-literal emotional meaning to natural phenomena, enriching storytelling by linking emotions and words.
Criticisms and Limitations of Pathetic Fallacy
Despite its power, pathetic fallacy has faced criticism. John Ruskin originally called it a form of flawed reasoning or emotional falseness, cautioning against attributing human emotions to nature.
Overuse can lead to melodrama or cliché, and it may overshadow characters’ agency by making them seem controlled by their environment. Some modern storytelling prefers a realistic portrayal where nature abhors human feelings and remains indifferent to human affairs.
Writers should use pathetic fallacy judiciously to maintain emotional impact without losing credibility.
Conclusion
Pathetic fallacy is a timeless literary device that effectively links human emotions with the natural world, enriching narratives by creating emotional connections and enhancing themes. Understanding its meaning, origins, and how to use it effectively helps writers craft stories that resonate deeply with readers.
By using pathetic fallacy effectively and combining it with other literary techniques, you can bring inanimate objects and non-human elements to life, making your writing more vivid, emotional, and memorable.
Ready to use this literary device in your writing? Take a look at our new courses here!
